us6506148 b2 что это

Материалы предназначены только для ознакомления и обсуждения. Все права на публикации принадлежат их авторам и первоисточникам.
Администрация сайта может не разделять мнения авторов и не несет ответственность за авторские материалы и перепечатку с других сайтов. Ресурс может содержать материалы 16+

Источник

Mind Manipulation: How Credible Are the Claims in the 6506148 B2 Patent?

Remember that gut-wrenching feeling of discovering that your partner has been fooling you for so long? No one wants to learn that their brain has been conditioned to believe lies. This is probably why a lot of people are obsessed with finding the truth about Patent 6506148 B2. A quick Google search will tell you that this patent opens the possibility of manipulating the nervous system through computers and televisions.

Is it true that the government controls our minds through the ads and shows we see through our TV sets and monitors? Is Patent US6506148 B2 fake, or does it hold some truth?

Understanding Mind Manipulation

Technically speaking, mind control is the ability to manipulate electrical activity in brain circuits. The technique frightens many as it has a tragic history of abuse. For instance, in the 1970s, neuropsychologist Robert Heath attempted to “cure” a homosexual man by inserting electrodes into his brain, stimulating his pleasure center. Meanwhile, Spanish neurophysiology professor José Delgado used a radio-controlled device to activate the electrodes implanted in a bull’s brain, manipulating its behavior and function.

Naturally, over the decades, various conspiracy theories have formed around mind control. In popular culture, it has been broadly defined as subjecting humans to indoctrination that impairs their autonomy or their ability to have independent beliefs. Adherents to the technique believed that they could control the human mind through the dissemination of propaganda messages. Mass communication theories like Framing, Priming, and Agenda Setting support the idea that the media can use messages to control the way the human mind thinks.

In theory, it is possible to influence the public’s ideas and beliefs through mass media. As people are exposed to a certain message, over time, they become attached to it, accepting it as a reality. Once this happens, then anyone can conclude that people’s thinking faculties have been altered.

Brainwashing in the History of War

Over the years, mind manipulation has moved from mere media propaganda messages to military abuse. As revealed by forensic psychologist Dick Anthony, the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) used brainwashing techniques against communism in the 1950s, amidst the Korean War. The big reveal prompted a deep investigation into the organization. Soon after, it was discovered that the US government had been dabbling in mind control techniques since World War II.

In 1945, the US government launched a secret intelligence program to recruit Nazi scientists. Code-named as Operation Paperclip, the program aimed to harness these Nazi scientists’ knowledge. They were promised protection from legal prosecution if they worked for the government. Once they started their operations, the scientists focused on various clandestine experiments, including mind manipulation through technology.

In the 1950s, the US Defense Department and the CIA supported these Nazi scientists in conducting the MKULTRA project, which was later renamed as Project ARTICHOKE. The research involved interrogation, mind control, behavior modification, and other related topics. Once these secret intelligence programs surfaced, the CIA never denied them. All the organization said about these clandestine projects was that they had been discontinued. To this day, you can visit the CIA’s online library and find bits of information about Operation Paperclip.

Indeed, it is difficult to trust the CIA. How do we know if they’ve succeeded in inventing technology that can manipulate the human mind? This is why it is alarming to learn about mind control patents.

What Is US6506148 B2?

The US Patent 6506148 B2, also known as ‘Nervous System Manipulation by Electromagnetic Fields from Monitors,’ was filed by Hendricus G. Loss in 2001. The patent was published in 2003, but no one could trace who Loss was. As such, he has been generally perceived as a fictitious person.

The patent claims that it’s possible to manipulate a subject’s nervous system by displaying pulsing images on a nearby TV set or computer monitor. The program material can be embedded with the image pulsing, overlaid by a video stream. It further illustrates how electromagnetic fields pulsed within the ideal frequencies can excite the subject’s sensory resonances. Included in the patent are several claims about how video transmission can manipulate a person’s nervous system.

Since the patent is available online with the description of the technique and all, it naturally became a cause of concern for many people. After all, free keyloggers for Mac and Windows are accessible online, and anyone can take inspiration from the patent to control the minds of unsuspecting computer users. Should we be concerned about the US6506148 B2 patent?

Should We Pay Close Attention to This ‘Mind Control’ Patent?

As we’ve mentioned, mass communication theories support the idea of influencing people’s thinking by exposing them to propaganda messages via the Internet or television. However, is it true that a person can be controlled by means of manipulating their nervous system?

The nervous system is responsible for controlling a person’s senses by transmitting messages throughout the body. Neuroscientists say that the brain controls the nervous system. A complex bioelectrical organ, the brain has the ability to produce electric fields. This is also the reason why listening to binaural beats and other similar techniques can help you rewire your brain for focus. For instance, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) can excite or jam certain brain circuits.

Now that we know that a patent for manipulating the brain through impulses is available, can we assume that the mind control US650 conspiracy is plausible?

The patent is a lot similar to how certain types of strobes can cause seizures. When you expose photoreceptors to particular stimuli, they can trigger reactions in the nervous system or the brain. Even so, we should look closely at the focus of the patent. If you read it, you will notice that it doesn’t involve visual stimuli. Instead, it focuses on skin stimuli through weak electromagnetic fields pulsed within 1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz frequencies.

Taken at face value, the patent does not look like a promising technique for mind manipulation. A quick glance will show you that it intends to use TV screens and computer monitors in managing spiking patterns, which may be disabling or at least annoying. However, we won’t consider US6506148 B2 debunked, and there’s probably something more to it than what we mentioned. However, if you dissect the patent closely, you won’t be able to catch any nefarious subtext in the content.

It’s also important to be wary of conspiracy theories. Because of the stressful life events around the world, people naturally find ways to make sense of the perplexing circumstances. Various COVID-19 conspiracy theories may offer seductive comfort in these uncertain times. However, they can rob us of life-saving medication and obstruct our socio-economic progress. As always, it is every individual’s responsibility to perform due diligence before believing anything they read online or see on their TVs.

Even so, we cannot ignore concerns related to electromagnetic fields (EMF). Within the last decade, hundreds of scientists from different countries reached out to the United Nations, asking the World Health Organization to implement protective guidelines for EMF exposure. These concerns are proof that we shouldn’t ignore ‘mind control’ patents. What’s more, they indicate that we must be careful about what we expose our eyes and minds to.

Источник

6506148 B2 Patent: Nervous System Manipulation – Is it Real or Just Paranoia?

Imagine someone manipulating how you feel. Of course, no one wants that. But how about being manipulated unknowingly? This is exactly what is happening to your nervous system every time you switch on your TV or computer.

Well, at least according to the 6506148 B2 Patent.

The patent named “Nervous System Manipulation By Electromagnetic Fields From Monitors” was filed in 2001 and published in 2003. The patent was filed by one Hendricus G. Loss (perceived to be a fictitious person as no information about who he really is can be traced).

Is it Worth Any Attention?

We already know that the content displayed on TVs or even on the internet is created in such a way as to influence decisions, such as when making a purchase or standing behind certain beliefs.

The mind control subject has been a topic of discussion for a long time. Although initially considered a conspiracy theory, its reality has been observed in the content displayed by mainstream media.

But how about manipulation through the nervous system?

Science teaches us that the work of the nervous system is to carry messages throughout the body and control your senses. The nervous system, according to neuroscientists, is controlled by the brain.

Now, the brain is said to be a complex bioelectrical organ that produces electric fields.

That’s why it’s believed that you can rewire your brain through techniques such as listening to binaural beats. Scientists also claim to control brain functions with a technique that uses powerful electromagnetic radiation. This technique, known as Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), can jam or excite particular brain circuits.

Think of how you are not allowed to use cell phones in some areas of a hospital or in an airplane (where some only allow use in airplane mode). This is so that the electromagnetic transmission of the phone does not interfere with critical electrical devices.

So if a brain is a bioelectrical organ, is there a possibility of manipulating it?

How it Happens, According to 6506148 B2 Patent

Here is a short excerpt from the patent abstract:

“Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation.

It is, therefore, possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be embedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.”

The US Patent 6506148 B2 is a confirmation of the possibility to manipulate the nervous system. The patent includes 14 claims including how video can be used to manipulate the nervous system.

Is it just a conspiracy theory?

Well, it’s not easy to tell. But we can’t ignore the concerns raised in regards to electromagnetic fields (EMF). The EMF issue has raised so much concern that in May 2015, 190 scientists from 39 nations submitted an Appeal to the United Nations requesting the World Health Organization (WHO) adopt more EMF exposure protective guidelines.

Such concerns are an indication that the patent should not be ignored. It also goes to show that apart from your electronic devices recording, monitoring and watching everything you are doing, they can also influence living organisms’ feelings, perceptions, thoughts and behavior.

Switch off that Screen

Well, this is practically not possible. The dependence on these electronic devices is so high that we are practically immobilized if they were to be turned off. Electronics have become part of human attachment.

The age of the Internet of Things (IoT) doesn’t make it any better. Now that we are surrounded by electromagnetic emitting devices, the patent serves as an alert to the public of the possibility of what could happen if these technologies were used unethically.

Unfortunately, the technology is here to stay. The only option is to minimize the exposure from your EMF emitting devices. Therefore it’s not a bad idea to try something different: read a book, go hiking, take a walk or simply switch off that screen when you can.

Источник

Howdy, as you’re reading this your nervous may be manipulated. Enjoy.

So, Im minding my own business, surfin the interwebs, when i come across this gem.

ABSTRACT
Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.

Even with subliminal intensity, nifty.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the stimulation of the human nervous system by an electromagnetic field applied externally to the body. A neurological effect of external electric fields has been mentioned by Wiener (1958), in a discussion of the bunching of brain waves through nonlinear interactions. The electric field was arranged to provide “a direct electrical driving of the brain”. Wiener describes the field as set up by a 10 Hz alternating voltage of 400 V applied in a room between ceiling and ground. Brennan (1992) describes in U.S. Pat. No. 5,169,380 an apparatus for alleviating disruptions in circadian rythms of a mammal, in which an alternating electric field is applied across the head of the subject by two electrodes placed a short distance from the skin.

A device involving a field electrode as well as a contact electrode is the “Graham Potentializer” mentioned by Hutchison (1991). This relaxation device uses motion, light and sound as well as an alternating electric field applied mainly to the head. The contact electrode is a metal bar in Ohmic contact with the bare feet of the subject, and the field electrode is a hemispherical metal headpiece placed several inches from the subject’s head.

In these three electric stimulation methods the external electric field is applied predominantly to the head, so that electric currents are induced in the brain in the physical manner governed by electrodynamics. Such currents can be largely avoided by applying the field not to the head, but rather to skin areas away from the head. Certain cutaneous receptors may then be stimulated and they would provide a signal input into the brain along the natural pathways of afferent nerves. It has been found that, indeed, physiological effects can be induced in this manner by very weak electric fields, if they are pulsed with a frequency near ½ Hz. The observed effects include ptosis of the eyelids, relaxation, drowziness, the feeling of pressure at a centered spot on the lower edge of the brow, seeing moving patterns of dark purple and greenish yellow with the eyes closed, a tonic smile, a tense feeling in the stomach, sudden loose stool, and sexual excitement, depending on the precise frequency used, and the skin area to which the field is applied. The sharp frequency dependence suggests involvement of a resonance mechanism.

A brave new world indeed.

Brought to us by the esteemed Hendricus J. Loos, who also patented
US6238333-Remote magnetic manipulation of nervous systems
US6091994-Pulsative manipulation of nervous systems
US6017302-Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous systems
US5782874-Method and apparatus for manipulating nervous systems

all within a few years of the big US switch from analog to digital TV. Coincidence?

some neural-network cutting edge stuff for the time.

Seems like a cool guy so far.

But says here that he was working with douglas aircraft co. in 1967.
hmmm.

So we have a prolific scientist, tied to advanced science projects working for government contractors as far back as the Johnson administration.
aaaaand who dabbles in advanced neural nets and mind control whammies.

and if thats not enough to get your conspiracy juices flowing here is a man with a bloated head.

Источник

• анудеск что это за программа →